HoSEM project

The summary of the HoSEM project in the previous post might prompt questions from CE workers. Some are suggested below, with answers from the Grant Application Form (GAF), and further comments.

(GAF:   http://gow.epsrc.ac.uk/NGBOViewGrant.aspx?GrantRef=EP/P031838/1 )

Who are the interested parties?
Apart from the university researchers, the GAF names EDF Energy as a partner.
Comment: this British energy company is owned by the French EDF (Électricité de France), which is itself state-owned and has world-wide interests. This raises the issue of how closely the HoSEM research is focussed on the UK.
See  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/electricite_de_France

How might a P2P system democratise the energy market?
The GAF implies democratisation in part from the use of distributed ledger technology (said to provide all market participants with read and write access to the records for the production, sale, and purchase of energy). 
Comment: would such a system be allowed at present in the UK?

What is wrong with the present market in the UK, from the view point of CE?
The GAF points out that at present, in the UK, small-scale, renewables-based energy generators must sell the excess of their production back to the grid at a set price (and by implication this is not an attractive price).

Why is a novel technical platform needed?
The GAF refers to 'sharing' platforms already in place in other markets, e.g., via Airbnb in the hotel industry, or Uber in taxi hire, but points to substantial intermediation charges.
Comments: 1) Presumably the new technology will reduce the intermediation charges. 
Would this be enough to enable new CE projects? 2) The term blockchain is not used in the GAF, perhaps to avoid unfortunate associations, or perhaps because a new kind of distributed ledger technology is envisaged.

What exactly would encourage households and organisations to participate in this market?
The GAF implies that reduced cost of selling excess energy would significantly benefit both producers and consumers, and freedom to control the energy destination would attract generators.
Comment: use of surplus energy in the local area should reduce transmission costs, if charging tariffs allow.

What are the possible configurations of P2P trades and algorithms for trade optimisation?
The GAF states the problem in terms of scale of operation, but does not develop this issue.

What would be the social and economic implications of such a market?
In the GAF examples of sectors affected are current market participants, the energy supply chain, and everyday individual and community life.
Comment: these and other issues invite further more detailed discussion in subsequent posts.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Energy maps and calculators

  The production and use of different forms of energy have been mapped geographically for a variety of reasons, and some examples will be outlined briefly before describing a recent place-based energy calculator for the UK. Scales of mapping vary in the examples from the global through region, country, city and parish down to city block. Both energy production and use have been mapped by type, such as coal, gas and oil, wind and solar renewables, by the associated emissions, and by energy flows between geographical regions. The purpose and the intended audience vary from case to case. The Global Atlas for Renewable Energy is a resource coordinated by the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) which “allows its users to find maps of renewable energy resources for locations across the world.” (Global Atlas for Renewable Energy, 2021). The Global Solar Atlas provides information on irradiation levels on land worldwide within a suitable range of latitudes, and calculates the o
Read more

Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage

    Introduction The need to limit the harmful effects of climate change is a powerful motive for preventing carbon dioxide emissions from entering the atmosphere, and for removing CO2 that is already there, but there can be subsidiary aims associated with carbon capture, and there are many methods of accomplishing it. According to a definition published in 2014, “Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) encompasses methods and technologies to remove CO2 from … flue gas and from the atmosphere, followed by recycling the CO2 for utilization and determining safe and permanent storage options” (RCN-CCUS, 2014a). A definition of carbon capture and storage (CCS) used by Torvanger (2020) “refers to a group of technologies that reduce emissions of carbon dioxide from coal-fired or gas-fired power stations, or from process industries." The term sequestration is also used for the removal of CO2 from the atmosphere or from combustion gases, and permanent prevention of its ret
Read more

Footprints and Offsets

    The term carbon footprint can apply to a single event, such as a journey, but often refers to the greenhouse gases (GHGs) produced by an individual or organisation in a complete year, resulting from factors such as travel, diet, and the use of goods and energy. Carbon footprints can be estimated using a carbon calculator, and the resulting figure is typically given in equivalent tonnes of carbon dioxide (tCO2e). Many online calculators will also suggest that the user buys carbon offsets based on the size of the carbon footprint calculated; for example, informed of an economy return flight from London to New York, one calculator stated that 1.8 t CO2 had been produced, and that this could be offset by a payment of £42 to “carbon offset projects in developing and newly industrialising countries”. Carbon offsets for the individual will be the main topic of this post. Emissions of greenhouse gas depend not only an individual’s lifestyle, but on geographical and temporal location,
Read more