Community Energy in the UK, Germany and the USA
Comparing CE in the UK, Germany and the USA
A
paper in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 94 (2018)
compares aspects of Community Energy (CE) in three countries. The
author, Vasco Brummer, seeks to sum up the current state of knowledge
on the subject, and to pursue the themes of societal benefits from,
and barriers to community energy in each country.
The
paper “Community energy – benefits and barriers: A
comparative literature review of Community Energy in the UK, Germany
and the USA, the benefits it provides for society and the barriers
it faces” is not currently available on open access.
The
countries were selected partly to reflect differences in their
policies towards supporting and regulating CE, and the effects on its
development. Germany was an early adopter of a Feed-in-Tariff (FiT)
scheme supporting Renewable Energy (RE), and this helped to build a
strong CE movement. In the UK a more market-driven approach was
taken, with a renewable portfolio standard (RPS)obliging energy
utilities to generate a fixed quota of their electricity from RE or
pay compensation. A FiT scheme was later added later for certain
projects. The United States has a wide variety of RE incentives from
state to state.
The
paper has three research questions: What is meant by the term
Community Energy? What benefits are generated for society by CE in
each country? What are the barriers that CE has to face in each
country?
62
papers were chosen for the literature review, and the author clearly
describes the principles of selection.
Ways
of understanding “Community”and “Community Energy” are
discussed.
Seven
broad types of benefit are identified and compared according to their
prominence in the literature. As examples, references to ‘community
building and self realisation’ occur more or less equally with
regard to the UK, Germany and the USA, but references to ‘economic
benefits’ occur much more frequently in papers on the UK than in
those of the other two countries. The benefits of innovation are
referred to in papers on CE in Germany and the USA, but not in those
on the UK.
Barriers
are also placed in seven broad groups; lack of resources, expertise
and resilience are frequently noted in papers on CE in the UK and
Germany, rarely in those on the USA. Lack of institutional and
political support is noted much more often in the UK context than in
that of Germany or the USA.
In
his summary on each country, Brummer notes that in the UK the great
complexity of the regulations on electricity generation and marketing
demand “outstanding effort and expertise for non-professional
individuals and groups to enter the market”, in a situation which
still favours large-scale centralised energy generation. CE in
Germany is characterised by the prevalence of Renewable Energy
Cooperatives, but discrimination against CE by policymakers can still
be a problem. CE in the USA is not recognised as a form of engagement
having unique policy needs and “big energy” is still favoured by
policymakers. CE initiatives are treated as rivals by incumbents.
The
paper ends with a discussion which stresses the general reliance of
CE on policy and incentives.
Comments
Post a Comment