CO2 in the Home
CO2 monitors of useful accuracy are available at modest price, and the information they provide about air quality in the home can be used in different ways.
A
first question in response to a home CO2 reading might be about its health
implications. This issue is addressed by Usha Satish et al. in their
2012 paper
Is
CO2 an Indoor Pollutant? Direct Effects of Low-to-Moderate CO2
Concentrations on Human Decision-Making Performance [1]
The
writers point out that it has been thought that adverse effects
attributed to raised CO2 levels in the home are actually due to other
pollutants commonly associated with CO2. They describe how their
experiment was designed to eliminate this possibility and so isolate
the effects of CO2.
Before
presenting their own findings, they summarise previous research on
levels of CO2 much higher than those likely to be encountered in the
home:
“CO2
concentrations > 20,000 ppm cause deepened breathing; 40,000 ppm
increases respiration markedly; 100,000 ppm causes visual
disturbances and tremors and has been associated with loss of
consciousness; and 250,000 ppm CO2 (a 25% concentration) can cause
death.”
They
measured the decision-making performance of participants in their
study while they breathed air at three levels of CO2; 600, 1,000 and
2,500 ppm. (these are all levels below that at which any health risks
have been noted). Moderate decreases in performance were found in
most tests at the two lower levels, and large decreases at the
highest level.
Reference
was made in the previous post (Indoor Air Quality) to recommendations
by the German Federal Environment Agency [2], in which levels of
indoor CO2 “below 1000 ppm are regarded as harmless, those between
1000 and 2000 ppm as elevated and those above 2000 ppm as
unacceptable.” The question of what level should be aimed at in any
particular household then becomes a matter involving priorities;
while many people would agree that 2000 ppm should not be exceeded,
some might feel that to aim at a much lower level of CO2 is
unrealistic, or that the necessarily high rate of air change would
not justify the associated energy cost.
A
second question about an indoor CO2 reading asks what it reveals
about the rate of air change in the room. This can be estimated if
the rate of CO2 produced by its occupants is known, and has reached
equilibrium with that being extracted from the room through
ventilation. An approximation in use for the CO2 output of a
typical sedentary adult is 20 litres per hour, but a more accurate
figure based on physical data for a particular individual can be
obtained from a calculation of metabolic rate [3]. The delay in
reaching equilibrium after a change in conditions can be
considerable, but the time required for measurement can be reduced if
curve fitting software is used to predict the final value from an
initial set of readings [4].
Where
data logging is available, a more elegant approach can be used, in
which the decay of the CO2 level is recorded under normal conditions
of ventilation, but starting when the room is vacated following a period of occupation. This method is
discussed in Simple and Cheap Air Change Rate Measurement Using
CO2 Concentration Decays by Roulet & Foradini (2002) [5].
Estimation
of air change rate by CO2 measurement may be considered as a third method alongside pressurisation and energy-balance, which were referred to in an earlier
post (A Change of Air, 11 May 2019).
References
[1]
Available at https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/full/10.1289/ehp.1104789
[2]
Umweltbundesamt. Gesundheitliche Bewertung von Kohlendioxid in der
Innenraumluft. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundh – Gesundh
2008:1358–69
(open
access)
[4]
e.g. https://mycurvefit.com
[5]
Open access, available at Researchgate
Comments
Post a Comment