Measuring Air Change Rates by CO2 Decay
A method and its limitations
The
three preceding posts have been about minimum safe levels of air
change, types of indoor air pollutants, and ways of estimating air
change rates. The last reference was to a method based on monitoring
the decay of indoor CO2 levels in a room or building [1]. This method
and its results will be examined here in more detail. The concept is
straightforward: CO2 is produced by the occupants of a space over a
suitable time, and then they leave. Normal ventilation is maintained,
and a monitor records the subsequent levels of CO2 in the space and
in the incoming air. These data allow calculation of the air changes
per hour (ACH).
The
exact value of the initial level of CO2 is unimportant. Under a
constant level of ventilation, the rate of removal of CO2 will be
proportional to its concentration in the space. This defines an
exponential decay, tending to equilibrium when CO2 concentration in
the space matches that in the incoming air. Monitoring must continue
for long enough to establish the time constant of the decay, and
illustrative results from another study will be given below.
Two
assumptions will be examined; that vacation of the building removes
all internal sources of CO2, and that the ventilation rate is
constant.
While
it will normally be easy to ensure that there are no people or pets
in a building, and no active sources of CO2 such as burning fuel, at
least one potential source is not easily removed. Soil is both a sink
and a source of CO2, and emissions of this and other gases from soil
have been the subject of study [2]. There are reports in grey
literature of CO2 from soil accumulating in buildings under some
conditions (e.g. in houses on former farm land) and this might
conceivably affect the measurement method [3].
The
variation of air change rate with external conditions has been
investigated by Tirfe [4]. The method described also used CO2 decay,
but in an empty building. CO2 was released into the building from a
cylinder operated by solenoid from a microcontroller, with a fan used to
aid mixing. A CO2 monitor was connected to the microcontroller, which
turned off the CO2 supply when, after a short time, the preset level
was reached. The decaying CO2 levels were then logged, and the
microcontroller switched the supply on again when a preset lower
limit was reached. Thus successive decays between fixed
concentrations were recorded. The decay rates differ with external
conditions, which were also monitored.
The
building used was a test laboratory with a volume of about 800 m3.
During a test session, the internal CO2 level decayed from 1100 ppm
to 365 ppm over 24 hours, during which external CO2 fluctuated between
345 to 365 ppm. The initial rate of decay (p.60) indicated a time
constant of about 5 hours. In
cyclic tests the preset levels used were 1200 and 550 ppm, allowing
four cycles to be completed in 30 hours. The times taken for each
cycle differed considerably, the shortest taking about 200 minutes,
and the longest about 800 minutes (p.86). The reasons for variation
are related in the analysis to temperature, wind speed and wind
direction, which are documented. The ACH figures over the test period
ranged from approximately 0.05 to 0.25.
The
relative cheapness of CO2 monitors of reasonable accuracy may
encourage attempts to measure the ACH of buildings. If results are
viewed in the light of the variability described above, it might be
concluded that an ACH figure obtained in conditions of still air and
little difference between internal and external temperatures could
provide a useful guide to a minimum or base level ACH figure.
Considerably higher figures would be expected as wind speeds and
temperature differentials increase. The theoretical models of
building infiltration discussed by Tirfe [4] might help to predict
these higher values.
References
are all open access:
[1]
Simple and Cheap Air Change Rate Measurement Using CO2
Concentration Decays by Roulet & Foradini (2002)
[2]
Greenhouse gas emissions from soils—A review
Cornelius
Oertel et al (2016)
[3]
Influence of Soil Moisture on Soil Gas Vapor Concentration for
Vapor Intrusion
Rui
Shen et al., (2013)
Comments
Post a Comment