Carbon Ruins
‘Carbon Ruins’ is an exhibition of the carbon era which invites the visitor into an imagined future where the transitions to post-fossil society have already happened. The future date is 2053, three years after global net-zero emissions of carbon dioxide were reached, and recognizable objects in the exhibition bridge the gap between daily life and the abstract impacts of climate change. These objects may include a 2014 cookbook which speculated on the possibility of cultivated meat, a piece of black coal from 2020, a sample of plastic grass from 2024, a diary of the 2025 milk riots in Brussels, the last toys made from plastic (an iconic material of the fossil fuel age), a recycled steel water bottle from 2034, and a 2038 picture of the last fast-food hamburger. The exhibits vary with the form taken by ‘Carbon Ruins’: since its beginning in 2019 these have included a mobile exhibition, audio presentation, educational material for schools, and part of the Human Nature exhibit at the Ethnographic museum in Stockholm (Lund University, 2021). The museum initially leaned towards Swedish experience, but Carbon Ruins Scotland, exhibited in Glasgow at COP26 in 2021 included items of local significance: ski equipment from the final run at Glenshee on artificial snow in 2137, a jar of North Sea oil, a ‘decarbonised’ whisky bottle, and a sign from the Torness Nuclear Power Station, decommissioned in 2030 (Carbon Ruins Scotland, n.d.).
Raven (2021) describes Carbon Ruins as a space of speculation about
climate change and adaptation to it and asks what academics have to do with “the
tools of science fiction, product design and participatory theatre?” He then
provides a threefold answer to his own question, in terms of making the
challenge of climate change concrete, situating its consequences in time and in
place, and rendering the discussion democratic. Concretisation of the problem means
in part “talking about possible futures in terms of the audience’s own
surroundings”, changes in the local climate, in the crops that can be grown
locally, and in local flood risks. Situation doesn’t only refer to place and
time, but also to the range of people who could each be very differently
affected by the same climatic changes. Making visualisation of the future
democratic can involve breaking the barriers presented by technical terms and
specialist knowledge, and tapping “the vast resource of everyday expertise in
lifestyle, practices and locations that years of ethnographic study could not
hope to replicate”.
Raven and Stripple (2021) discussed the “ethics of speculative
decarbonisation” and took the ‘Carbon Ruins’ exhibition as a case study. They
saw the exhibition as documenting the Great Expansion of fossil fuel use from
1849 to 1972; the Fossil Fears, “defined by the oil crises of the 1970s”; the
three decades of the Transition Years, beginning in the early 2020s; and key
moments such as when the “regulators finally caught up”. The Museum exhibits
have been described above, and for the authors of the paper it is the
discussions that they provoke which are key to the museum’s purpose; museum guides
draw on techniques of “immersive theatre and performative communications” and on
the stories which surround the exhibits, relating to sectors “including food, transport, steel,
energy, plastic and climate futures”.
The authors view the ethical issues surrounding the project from three
perspectives; the fact that the project exists at all, its aim, and the means
employed. The first view begins with acknowledging the exhibition’s implicit
value assumption that “decarbonising society is itself a worthwhile project”.
The speculative nature of the museum can be seen as aiming to allow “citizens
to be part of a process” – policy production – “from which they are normally
very distant.” It could be said that it would be unethical not to help fill in the details of a future which is usually
“sketched mostly in technical and quantitative terms.” The second perspective,
regarding the aims of the exhibition, is less straightforward, since the
political feasibility of decarbonisation is involved. While the exhibition
could be excused from considerations of policy making, it is concerned with the
ways that policies “might affect the lives of ordinary citizens”. It must
presumably aim to persuade visitors “that a zero-carbon future is not only
possible but plausibly desirable”; however the authors reject the idea that the
museum acts as a marketing campaign. It is “at pains to emphasise the
struggles, conflicts and losses that the transition will entail” while
depicting a successful transition in a plausible and hopeful light, to help
citizens to grasp implications of policy, and “to evaluate and critique the
futures that the policy is promising them.” A local focus is unavoidable, and
encourages the research community to “translate abstract climate science and
policy into the everyday course of life”. While the exhibition can be
criticised on the grounds that it lacks inclusivity, the authors “maintain that the ethical thing
is to do the best we can” and that such criticism should be welcomed as an
opportunity to improve the work. The final perspective concerns “the manner and
methods of the speculative process”. One concern with speculative futures is
that they may unintentionally deceive their viewers into “believing that what
they are seeing is actuality”. This issue can apply to any speculative
imaginings: the authors quote a saying of the science fiction author Charlie
Stross: ‘I tell lies for a living’. The methods used by the museum are arguably
“the same as those used to sell political programmes” but they make its
fictional frame fairly obvious: its goal “was always to stimulate discussion
and engagement rather than to dictate a particular promissory future”.
Exhibitions based on the ideas embodied in Carbon Ruins, with
exhibits appropriate to their own locality may have considerable appeal, and
Manchester Museum plans its own Carbon Ruins exhibition, to coincide with its
reopening in 2023, with input from schools in the Manchester area (Carbon Ruins
Manchester, 2022). The strengths and weaknesses of such exhibitions, as outlined
above, deserve careful consideration. Perhaps
one of the greatest strengths of Carbon Ruins is that visitors who are invited to
step imaginatively into the year 2053, when climate change appears to be under
control, are offered temporary relief from the anxiety which the prospect of
uncontrolled climate change can produce, and can then more easily contemplate
the road which must be travelled in order to reach climate security. Constructive
engagement with efforts to mitigate climate change may then be easier, perhaps
even for those whose fears about the future have led them to deny the reality
of climate change and consequently to avoid taking actions to prevent it.
References
Carbon Ruins Manchester, 2022, Manchester Museum, online, accessed 30
June, 2022
https://mmhellofuture.wordpress.com/2022/06/24/carbon-ruins-manchester/
Carbon Ruins Scotland, Climaginaries, online, accessed 28 June 2022
https://www.climaginaries.org/carbon-ruins-scotland
Lund University, 2021, Carbon Ruins, online, accessed 17 December 2021
https://www.climatefutures.lu.se/carbon-ruins
Raven, P., 2021, Concretise, situate, democratise: The Museum of Carbon
Ruins, TransformingSociety, online, accessed 28 June 2022
Raven, P., and Stripple, J., 2021, Touring the carbon ruins: towards an
ethics of speculative decarbonisation, Global
Discourse, online, accessed 17 December 2021
https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bup/gd/2021/00000011/f0020001/art00023
Comments
Post a Comment