Narrative and Climate Change

A straightforward view of the importance of narrative in relation to climate change is made by Rosenberg, 2023, who refers to the dangers posed by human-induced climate change, and states that “Communicating this issue beyond the scientific community is a complex and difficult endeavor. Climate change is unfolding on a time scale that is difficult for humans to grasp and comprehend.” She claims that “Storytelling has the power to invoke emotions, increase knowledge, and inspire action” and outlines a project that will “create a bridge that connects people to the world of climate change science and those who dedicate themselves to its pursuit.”

In his additional chapters to ‘Orality and Literacy’ (Ong, 2013) John Hartley touches on general aspects of the power of narrative and its medium. He touches on the abstraction of writing and print from the immediacy of speech, the formation of the modern mind “in the crucible of language”, the determination of mind by medium, the soft power of ideas disguised as entertainment, and the replacement of the former control of truth by publishers with its democratisation through the internet. Narrative is commonly taken to mean the way that a story is told, and this post will explore some views on its place in climate change discussions.

Moezzi , Janda , and Rotmann (2017) introduced a special issue of Energy Research & Social Science devoted to this topic: the keywords listed for their article are Stories, Storytelling, Narratives, Imaginaries, Energy and Climate change. They begin with the premise that “Energy and climate change research has been dominated by particular methods and approaches to defining and addressing problems, accomplished by gathering and analysing the corresponding forms of evidence” and describe the special issue as starting “from the broad concepts of stories, narratives, and storytelling to go beyond these analytic conventions … using lenses from social sciences, humanities, and practitioners’ perspectives.” They ask how the multiple perspectives of individuals, which arise from their emotional and personal beliefs, can be balanced with the need for collective action. While stories can influence and engage audiences, they are not an approach that researchers and practitioners are necessarily familiar with: the special issue therefore “aims to present and cultivate structures for understanding, interpreting, and applying stories within energy and climate change research and policy by presenting a breadth of analytical approaches, and showcasing projects and research that feature stories or their performance in the energy and climate change fields.”

Darby (2017) interviewed low-income householders and their energy advisers in a district of Scotland whose economy had long depended on coal and paraffin shale mining. She points out that the “term ‘story’ can be understood as a fiction, something out of place in rational discourse” but that stories are nevertheless “a constant in research literature”, situating the work in some narrative, such as global warming, the factors contributing to a disease, or a problem in modern housing. Her paper has two premises: “that energy transition operates at many levels or scales and can be understood at many levels; and that transition is not a uniform process but one influenced by both geography and history.” The experience of trying to interpret the stories of her interviewees indicated the importance of “dialogue between the particular and the general” and pointed to the conclusion “that we need to plan for and evaluate energy transitions with the help of narratives as well as measurements” without which “grand narratives of transition lose meaning and power.”

Muto, 2017, “applies concepts from discourse theory and narrative analysis to explore how a case for federal government intervention in the smart grid standardization process was constructed given a decades-long policy in the US for industry leadership.” She notes that while smart grids ideally offer reduced carbon emissions and increased use of renewable resources, at a practical level they entail “the integration of information and communications technology (ICT) into electric transmission and distribution networks.” Part of her discussion revolves around storylines, which have been described as “organisational devices that tie the different elements of a policy challenge together in a reasonably coherent and convincing narrative”. They can be employed so as to impose on others a particular version of events and their power lies not in correspondence with evidence or the causal nature of a situation, but on their ability to ‘sound right’. Storylines may be based on familiar plotlines, such as those of myths, using standard figures like the hero, honest broker, martyr or wanderer. The use of such devices can obscure a failure to confront reality, and Muto considers that that in the case of smart grid standards, policy storylines replaced complex debates and detracted from proper public deliberation. She suggests that the type of storyline that may be needed in similar situations is the learning story, “one that tells of us how the challenge is more complicated than initially thought” and requires “an ongoing process that will need sustained effort.”

Smith et al. (2017) describe a project on the “creative uses of stories and storytelling to engage groups and individuals with … changes in energy systems”. Climate change is recognised as a “major collective risk”, but the “scale of this peril is not reflected in public or political responses.” The project encouraged critical reflection upon “the use of stories and narratives in approaching complex long term issues of public significance” and referred to the use of stories as history and as future scenarios, in fictional narratives and in digital storytelling. Stories were seen as a method of connecting with disparate communities, and as a means by which people make sense of events: the project’s prime focus was on “the contribution that the human imagination can make to the task of revealing and presenting accounts of energy-society relations of the past, present and future.”

An example of storytelling in an apparently unlikely area is provided in the formulation of energy policy, since this can be seen as “predicated upon scenario building, future scoping or modelling … it is imagining a desired future, and identifying the narrative that leads there.” More generally, part of the difficulty of communicating the “risks associated with climate change and the consequent need for energy system transformations” may be related to the problem which many people have in visualising energy, and “imaginative modes of interaction or intervention can make it possible or even easy for them to ‘see’ energy, or rather to perceive its presence, and in turn to ‘take more care’ of it.”

Cloke, Mohr and Brown (2017) are concerned with community renewable energy projects in the Global South. While they do not use the word ’story’ in their paper, the word ‘imaginary’ is used as a noun. In literary criticism this usage can mean “a collective picture of an era derived from books, films, television”, such as the Wild West (Christie, 2023). The ‘imaginaries’ with which the authors are concerned are of the sociotechnical variety, and their context is renewable energy technologies used to address the ‘energy trilemma’ through projects in the Global South. The trilemma expresses the need to simultaneously address energy security, climate change mitigation and energy access/equity. The authors argue that a failure to understand the heterogeneous lives of the poor in such areas can limit the success of projects, which are too often envisaged within a “top-down technologically-driven framework that limits their ability to provide sustainable solutions to energy poverty and improving livelihoods. This framing is linked to how energy interventions are being imagined and constructed by key actors in the sector” and “sociotechnical imaginaries” are at fault through envisaging “increasingly universalised energy futures for rural communities.” Instead they propose an approach that recognises the interaction between “energy systems literacy, project community literacy and political literacy.”

Howarth (2017) claims that in the UK engagement with climate change may be increased if messages are framed as narratives around specific themes. She reports that research based on interviews suggested six dominant narratives: Investment, wealth, and cost; Maintaining independence and freedom of choice; Visualising the future; Broader appeal, salience and the impact of not doing anything; Preserving the status quo/less change; and Quality of life – a safe, clean world. The paper contains a range of definitions and characteristics of narrative (table 2). These include an introduction to a situation, a series of events often involving tension or conflict, and a resolution; a sequence of facts and observations linked together by a unifying theme or argument; a dynamic and persuasive system of stories; the aim of unification into a cohesive, coordinated and effective message; discourses with a clear sequential order that connect events in a meaningful way for a definite audience; a setting, characters, and a solution; and the connection of political debate about problems and solutions with media users’ experiences and identities.

Brown (2017) reviews the ways in which a narrative perspective can offer insights into complex phenomena, and potentially contribute to energy research. While the “actions of individuals are recognised as crucial in reducing energy demand and shifting people towards sustainable energy sources” the promotion of pro-environmental behaviour has not achieved broad transformations in energy conservation behaviours. Researchers have started to draw on narrative in their work, and the paper articulates the foundations of the narrative turn from its development within literary theory to its adoption by the social sciences, with particular reference to psychological theory. “Such work has looked at how people make sense of their lives and how energy policies can embed particular narratives within them in order to evoke particular individual responses and understand community-level approaches to environmental challenges.”

Bergman (2017) considers stories of the future through two innovations, electric vehicles and car clubs. He sees the creation of future visions as part of the innovation process, and reports from a project on future visions of personal mobility in the UK. Such visions can be “powerful tools in public discourse and policymaking, because those that become widely accepted can shape expectations about the future, and therefore motivate actions in the present towards such a future.” To succeed they must employ realistic strategies and tactics, “achieving the right balance between utopia and realism”, and they are arguably “not separate from the technological innovation process” but formative elements of it. The paper focuses on the frames and narratives which make these stories influential. Cognitive science suggests that frames (or schemata) are the unconscious structures entrenched in our everyday thinking, and can determine “which parts of reality become noticed”. They can be thought of as “principles of selection, emphasis and presentation composed of little tacit theories about what exists, what happens, and what matters”.

Frame types identified in the study include Economic frames (economic growth, markets, consumer choice); Technological frames (technology as progress, technological breakthrough); Political frames (greater good, responsibility); and Transport and sustainability frames (continued automobility, (un)sustainable transport). Frames may be woven together into discourse by different actors through narrative, and examples are given of narratives of success, of frustration, and of technology neutrality.

Raven, 2017, sees prose science fiction as a tool for energy futures research and for the critique of energy futures. “A narrative making use of the science fiction toolbox can propose a practice and critique it simultaneously; as such, this can be considered a form of prototyping or design practice.” It can make accessible “topics which normally carry the taint of jargon and expertise, and depict them from the perspectives of everyday people.” This can open up discussion around energy futures, “turning the discourse away from its current technocratic paradigm and towards a more inclusive, participatory process in which citizens can recognise their own experiences and perspectives.”

Raven discusses the portrayal of futures, and develops the case for science fiction, ending with a summary of arguments for and against it as a means of portraying energy futures. In its favour, it is cheap by contrast with narrative media such as video; flexible in its ability to handle the mundane as well as the astonishing; collaborative in that it permits co-production with others; accessible both for authors and readers; and complete with its own deep studies literature as well as a wealth of material for critique. Against science fiction in the proposed role is the qualitative nature of its output, which is “highly unlikely to win over the policy sector” unaided; the challenge of writing excellent material which is also collaborative, accessible and inclusive; and the “risk of portraying a potential or possible future” which is then taken as a predicted or promised future.   

Hagbert and Bradley (2017) contrast the prevailing discourse in sustainable housing which tends to focus on building performance, “green” lifestyles and attractive urban housing concepts, with alternative narratives “manifested in (and through) the home as a starting point for transitions to a low-impact society.” Their research is set in Sweden, where they compare “narratives surrounding low-impact ways of living that shape and are shaped by notions of what the sustainable home is and could be” with the “dominant market-led story of eco-efficiency”. In the context of the built environment, this may focus on sustainable building technologies and be linked to “urban densification” where new construction is “primarily located to former brown field sites or already appropriated urban land” and associated with existing infrastructure. Critics of such an approach consider that “a decoupling of continued economic growth from further environmental pressure is unattainable” and believe that more radical approaches are needed. The authors explored “narratives among people engaged in what might be considered more or less fringe low-impact practices, in order to diversify discourses on sustainable living.”

Several narrative themes emerged from these interviews. There was “a common criticism of the (in)ability of societal institutions to act on pressing global and local challenges” and a perception of vulnerability in systems such as an inflated housing market; the economy; urbanization; outsourced food production; and a consumption-oriented lifestyle. There was also “a perceived need to manage resources responsibly and in ways that demand direct commitment from individuals, situated in their everyday life and home environment”. A shared storyline sought an understanding of how different technical and ecological systems work, and a reconnection with production processes and practices that have been removed from the household and from individuals. Importance is attached to re-localization of energy generation, self-maintenance of housing, and food production. Interviewees engaged in “various forms of voluntary scaling back in consumption levels, based largely in their aforementioned criticism of a resource-intensive consumer society”. These might include “downshifting from full-time work within the money based economy” and “reassessment of living standards and the need to consume to create a fulfilling home life.” Collaboration to build local resilience was a key theme, both out pragmatism and from a social perspective “where sharing ideas, skills, and each other’s company also provides intellectual stimulation for engaging in the ways of living” of the interviewees.

 

References

 

Bergman, N., 2017, Stories of the future: Personal mobility innovation in the United Kingdom, , Energy Research & Social Science, online, accessed 2 August 2023

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629617302001

Brown, P., 2017, Narrative: An ontology, epistemology and methodology for pro-environmental psychology research, Energy Research & Social Science, online, accessed 2 August 2023

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629617301767

Cloke, J., Mohr, A., and Brown, E., 2017, Imagining renewable energy: Towards a Social Energy Systems approach to community renewable energy projects in the Global South, Energy Research & Social Science, online, accessed 2 August 2023

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629617301895

Christie, M., 2023, “imaginary” as a noun, online, accessed 1 Aug 2023

https://mypointbeing.com/2015/11/04/imaginary-as-a-noun/

Darby, S. J., 2017, Coal fires, steel houses and the man in the moon: Local experiences of energy transition, Energy Research & Social Science, online, accessed 29 July 2023

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629617301457

Hagbert, P., and Bradley, K., 2017, Transitions on the home front: A story of sustainable living beyond eco-efficiency, Energy Research & Social Science, online, accessed 3 August 2023

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221462961730110X

Howarth, C., 2017, Informing decision making on climate change and low carbon futures: Framing narratives around the United Kingdom’s fifth carbon budget, Energy Research & Social Science, online, accessed 2 August 2023

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629617301822

Moezzi, M., Janda, K.B., and Rotmann, S., 2017, Using stories, narratives, and storytelling in energy and climate change research, Energy Research & Social Science, online, accessed 29 July 2023

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629617302050

Muto, S., 2017, From laissez-faire to intervention: Analysing policy narratives on interoperability standards for the smart grid in the United States, Energy Research & Social Science, online, accessed 31 July 2023

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629617301652

Ong, W., 2013, Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word, 30th Anniversary Edition, London and New York, Routledge, pdf online, accessed 29 July 2023

https://repo.iainbatusangkar.ac.id/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/8313/1509096806518_%28New%20Accents%29%20Walter%20J.%20Ong%2C%20John%20Hartley-Orality%20and%20Literacy_%20The%20Technologizing%20of%20the%20Word%20%2830th%20anniversary%20ed.%20with%20additional%20chapters%29-Routledge%20%282012%29.pdf

Raven, P.G., 2017, Telling tomorrows: Science fiction as an energy futures research tool, Energy Research & Social Science, online, accessed 3 August 2023

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629617301639

Rosenberg, J., 2023, Climate Stories From Generations of Changemakers, 2023, UCSD, online, accessed 29 July 2023

https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5s21h9w4

Smith, J., et al., 2017, Gathering around stories: Interdisciplinary experiments in support of energy, Energy Research & Social Science, online, accessed 1 Aug 2023

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629617301974

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage

Energy maps and calculators

Climate fiction and climate action