SDGs, Sunak’s retrenchment, and the UK carbon budget
A June editorial in Nature (2023) commented that “the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals are heading for the rocks” although the “failure to meet even one of the SDGs is not for want of trying.” It referred to the 2023 Global Sustainable Development Report, published a few days previously, in which “an independent group of science advisers to the UN proposed a way forwards” (GSDR, 2023). The Nature editorial promised a series of articles looking forward to the September session of the UN General Assembly in New York, at which the Sustainable Development Goals would be debated. The UN described this 78th session as marking “a crucial milestone in the journey towards achieving the 2030 Agenda and the urgent need to put the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) back on track.” (UN, 2023)
The General
Debate took place between 19th and 26th September. On
September 20th, The Guardian carried an article about PM Sunak’s
plans to delay some climate targets, in order “to save money for families”
(Guardian, 2023a). The plans were presented in the article under the headings
of cars, boilers, insulation, and behaviour change. The date for banning the
sale of new cars with combustion engines has been pushed back from 2030 to
2035; plans to phase out the installation of gas boilers by 2035 have been
changed to aim for only an 80% phase-out; homeowners and landlords would no
longer be required to meet energy efficiency targets; and the PM confirmed that
“his party will not take forward policies that would encourage more sustainable
behaviour, such as taxing airlines properly and informing the public of the
carbon footprint of meat.” Comments pointing to the defects in the proposals
appeared under each heading, with a final section entitled “The costs of not
reaching net zero” which referred to the “negative long-term impact on the UK
economy”, the costs of continued gas reliance, cost of living impacts from
extreme weather events, and suffering the long-term consequences of a warmer
world. The article ended with a point made by Prof. Ed Hawkins of the
University of Reading, that “It also matters how we reach net zero, not just
when”. This aspect of climate change planning received relatively little
attention in the initial media coverage and will be explored further below.
The UK
Government’s legal obligation to meet its net zero commitments is widely known,
but the five-year carbon budgets already set are also legally binding. A
guidance document on the subject states that “A carbon budget places a
restriction on the total amount of greenhouse gases the UK can emit over a
5-year period. The UK is the first country to set legally binding carbon
budgets” (GOV.UK, 2016). The dates and targets for budgets 4 to 6 are: 2023 –
2027, 1,950 MtCO2e; 2028 – 2032, 1,725 MtCO2e; and 2033 -- 2037, 965 MtCO2e.
These budgets would presumably have to be unaffected by the recent plans to
delay meeting targets if they are to stay within the law.
There have
been comments on possible legal challenges to PM Sunak’s relaxation of climate
targets. The Guardian (2023b, 2023c) reported that campaigners “including
Friends of the Earth and The Good Law Project are now assessing how they can
stop a rollback that would allow new petrol and diesel cars, and gas boilers,
to be sold for longer” while a possible legal action by an individual was the
subject of an article in The National (2023). The latter may argue that the
Government is required to follow a series of carbon budget plans on the way to
becoming net zero by 2050.
In its
recent assessment of announcements and developments (CCC, 2023) the UK’s Climate
Change Committee reported that the recent policy announcements “were not
accompanied by estimates of their effect on future emissions, nor evidence to
back the Government’s assurance that the UK’s targets will still be met”. The CCC urged the Government “to adopt greater
transparency in updating its analysis at the time of major announcements.”
While acknowledging that it did not have all the information that it needed for
a full assessment, the CCC attempted to predict how plans to meet climate
change targets would be affected. Some targets will be harder to meet through “both
the direct impacts of reduced policy ambition and through the Government’s
indication that it will loosen certain Net Zero policies.” The decarbonisation
of buildings will be more difficult due to the exemption of 20% of households
from the phase-out which “will have an impact on emissions all the way out to
2050 – making Net Zero considerably harder to achieve”, and it creates
uncertainty for consumers and supply chains. In view of the Zero Emission
Vehicle (ZEV) Mandate, delaying the fossil car phase-out date to 2035 is “expected
to have only a small direct impact on future emissions”, though the uncertainty
that has been introduced by changing near-term consumer targets may have
indirect consequences. The perception that the Government’s ambition regarding Net Zero has been relaxed
“risks undermining consumer confidence and the development of UK supply chains,
which are particularly important for delivery of buildings decarbonisation.” Overall,
the CCC thinks that the UK is unlikely to meet its Nationally Determined
Contribution “to reduce emissions by 68% between 1990 and 2030” and urges the
Government “to restate strong British leadership on climate change in the crucial
period before COP28.”
References
CCC, 2023, CCC
assessment of recent announcements and developments on Net Zero, Climate Change
Committee, 12 October 2023, online, accessed 13 Oct
2023
GOV.UK, 2016,
Carbon Budgets, GOV.UK, updated 2021, online, accessed 16 Oct 2023
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/carbon-budgets
GSDR, 2023, 2023
Global Sustainable Development Report, UN Department of Economic and Social
Affairs, online, accessed 14 Oct 2023 https://sdgs.un.org/gsdr/gsdr2023
Guardian,
2023a, UK net zero policies: what has Sunak scrapped and what do changes mean?
The Guardian, 20 September 2023, online, accessed 14 Oct 2023
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/sep/20/uk-net-zero-policies-scrapped-what-do-changes-mean
Guardian,
2023b, Rishi Sunak
likely to face legal challenges over net zero U-turn, The Guardian, 21 Sept
2023, online, accessed 14 Oct 2023
Guardian,
2023c, Rishi Sunak announces U-turn on key green targets, The Guardian, 20 Sept
2023, online, accessed 17 Oct 2023
National,
2023, Chris Packham launches legal challenge against Rishi Sunak, The National,
4 Oct 2023, online, accessed 14 Oct 2023
https://www.thenational.scot/news/23832473.chris-packham-issues-legal-challenge-pm-delay-net-zero/
Nature, 2023,
The world’s plan to make humanity sustainable is failing. Science can do more
to save it, Nature, 20 June 2023, online, accessed 14 Oct 2023
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-01989-9
UN, 2023,
General Assembly High-level
Week 2023, United Nations, online, accessed 16 Oct 2023
Comments
Post a Comment